|
Review Published in BIBLIO
A Long Short Story
Navtej Sarna
Reaching Bombay Central. By Shama Futehally, Viking, 2002;
Pp 154; Rs. 225.
Shama Futehally’s Reaching Bombay Central is
all about small favours, the innocent sounding inevitable little
requests that are inserted into so many phone conversations,
slipped in between solicitous enquiries about the welfare of the
children and exhortations to do lunch sometime, the requests that
usually begin with “By the way, could you do me one…..”.
It’s a nice peg to pitch a story upon, cutting as it does straight
into a major Delhi preoccupation, the give and take of the
everyday life of a civil servant. And per se, there is nothing
wrong with the asking and doing of small favours, as long as they
are, as the civil servants would put it, “within rules and
regulations.” In fact, sometimes one may be forgiven for thinking
that these small favours form a network of IOUs that is sometimes
stronger than the steel framework itself.
But when a the bond of a common religion becomes, for all apparent
purposes, the reason for the granting of one such small favour, as
in this neat little novel, the game loses its innocence. A senior
Government servant, Aarif Jamal is called upon to do a small
favour to a man called Hamid and after much tossing and turning,
grants him a license. Its not as if Hamid himself has asked for a
favour; in that case it probably would not have been granted. It
is asked by a man named Shiv Prasad Nath and in so doing, he is
underlining in Aarif’s sensitive perception that is all too aware
of belonging to a minority, the unity of the whole, the essential
integration of society. Hamid proceeds to misuse the license and a
bureaucrat’s nightmare opens up in the life of the honest and
correct Aarif. In a political incensed atmosphere, the officer is
soon facing the precipice of a departmental enquiry that can lead
to his suspension. Somewhat naively, his hopes turn to his wife’s
uncle, a senior police officer. Perhaps he could make sure that
the enquiry is fair and above board. So the wife, Ayesha, begins
the train journey to Bombay Central.
The purpose of the journey is never convincing. Surely it would
have been easier to use the telephone. It would have saved Ayesha
the rather weak surprise that she gets during the journey when she
discovers from a snippet in the newspaper that her uncle has
indeed retired from service. Be that as it may, the journey
provides Futehally a framework in which to unfold her tale. And
that she does deftly and competently, enmeshing the events of the
past few days with the conversations in the train compartment,
lacing her pain and anguish with the colours and smells that rush
past her train window.
The story seems to follow the pace of the train, trickling out
slowly as the train clears the filth and slum that surrounds the
station and coming out in more meaningful bursts as the train
rushes through the wide open spaces. The stage in the compartment
is set out very deliberately, perhaps a trite too deliberately.
The fellow passengers are meant to provide a cross- section of our
society today, or at least a part of it. There is a ponderous
politician who believes he should have been given an
air-conditioned berth, a retired high court judge wearing a bundi,
a young journalist going to Mumbai to investigate the riots,
several months after they happened and a young tenacious woman
going to join a bank. Ayesha finds herself among this set,
listening to their conversations, eating the predictable train
lunches, “rapidly, secretively and without comment,” with them
while nursing her private pain.
Futehally evokes well the camaraderie of the compartment. As this
feeling develops, Ayesha feels she can let go. “And now she could
cry at the memory as she was never able to cry at home. The tears
winked and splashed, a moving wall of Cellophane around her……There
was no need to hide. There was even a strange kind of peace in
being able to sob away in this strange little home, among the
green leather seats that had become so familiar. Because those
around her were not clinging children or disapproving in-laws or
over-anxious relatives. They were only friends, and they would
leave her along to cry in peace.”
Shama Futehally demonstrates a keen observation and catches neatly
the flicker of an eyelash, the pause in a sentence, the slightest
glance that can add immense meaning to an otherwise innocent
situation. She catches how the young journalist hides a cigarette
behind his back when he sees Ayesha, “with the half nervous, half
courteous gesture which she associated with drivers and peons, and
not with confident yuppies.” In some ways, this is the observation
of the short story writer who tries to load the maximum meaning
into a very brief space. Fatehally also has the restraint of a
short story writer and one misses the sweep of the novelist. The
characters are drawn with thin lines, smudged into their own
shadows. One can imagine them, rather than see them. Even the main
characters, Ayesha and her husband are developed just enough so as
to serve the purpose of the immediate storyline. There are few
other details, details that may sound extraneous to the short
story writer but those which give a novel its depth and context,
just as a few wild roses can embellish beyond recognition a
well-maintained hedge. The writing too is straightforward and
plain and the book would certainly have gained with more
invigorating and vibrant language. Only once in a while does Shama
Futehally let herself go: “Snails meant dark afternoons spent by
the window while the rain hurtled down, while trees roared and
crashed, and the sky was cleaved by whips of fire. You watched
from the window and felt a delicious fear which was not fear at
all. Later on she had loved to share these moments with her
children, these moments of fear which really meant that you were
safe. From now on all fear would be real fear.” One wishes she
would have done this more often and turned this book which reads
like a rather long short story into a more fleshed out novel.
|