|
|
 |
|
SINGH WHO WAS KING
The
Exile,
Navtej Sarna,
Viking, Rs 450
Navtej Sarna’s portrait of Duleep Singh, the last maharaja of
Punjab, is as much about the exile within as it is about his
estrangement from his land.
Seema
Chishti
Posted: Oct 05, 2008 at 1307 hrs IST

A couple of years ago, William Dalrymple, in
some interviews given prior to the publication of The Last Mughal, set
the cat among the pigeons by comparing the popular historian in the
western world with what was the case in India. He said that while in
the West, you had historians like Simon Schama and Niall Ferguson
engaged in popular history, writing biographies of interesting and
intriguing characters or coming up with a historical perspective on
contemporary events in regular columns, historians in India
weren’t doing that. Indian historians descended on Dalrymple like a
tonne of bricks and insisted that appropriate and relevant work in
India was indeed going on. The debate, like several such, generated
more heat than light and wasn’t exactly settled.
This is not to say that Navtej Sarna’s Exile
belongs to that genre of writing history in an accessible way (which
perhaps also implies historical themes handled in English, more
journalistic than academic, and brought out by a big publishing house,
out in paperback very soon). Sarna does not even make such a claim. In
his note, he admits that he has pushed the boundaries of fact and
merged it with fiction, if only, as he says, to “reach for the edges
of Duleep Singh’s story… pushing available facts towards the realm
of fiction, but pushing them gently, so as not to distort them”. To
the author’s credit, he does it well, and fulfils, at least in some
measure, the need for taking on a subject with a deep historical
resonance, appeal and context.
In a system like ours, obsessive about dates
and heroes as far as history went, The Exile is an interesting attempt
to look at the life of Duleep Singh, the youngest of maharaja Ranjit
Singh’s “acknowledged sons”, who at the age of 11 was the last
maharaja of Punjab. Duleep didn’t really know his father well, he
was almost doubtful of his paternity, in this novel, and exhausted by
the inheritance which he describes as “crushing”.
As
the young Duleep Singh is taken by the British and sent off to live in
the UK as a “country squire” (not before converting him to
Christianity), the novel tries to detail his life through, apart from
himself, four contemporaries — his ADC, his mother’s maid, his
British guardian and his “trusted” chief of staff, who is by
self-admission, fascinated by his “talent for misfortune”. The
details and the narrative that emerge are rich and make good reading
because of the five pairs of eyes that take you through the tragedy of
Punjab as it splintered after Ranjit Singh’s death. Even the account
of the maidservant, the charming and ambitious Mangla, details an
important segment of Indian life in the 19th century. It is almost
Manto-esque, with descriptions of Lahore, Hira Mandi, the
punkahwallahs, the kanjarkhana, and the deep desire of a girl there to
escape the gullies and bazaars and make it to higher quarters. The
Exile deals with much more than just the estrangement of a failed
prince from Punjab, who found both his father’s legacy and the
hostile circumstances unbearable.
Duleep Singh dies a lonely man, broken and
miserable in the novel, in a nondescript hotel in Paris. However, for
all the loneliness in the end, Duleep Singh’s is a crowded exile,
which perhaps makes it even more difficult to cope with. He describes
how those who baptised him used water from the Ganga “to add a holy
dimension of the river for me”. Duleep does trust his new extended
family for a while — on church visits and gossip sessions in the sun
with them — but soon enough the truth about Dalhousie’s devious
plans sinks in, of people who took away all his possessions, including
the Koh-i-Noor, with a pension purportedly to buy his rights and his
soul.
Duleep tries to give up his (deeply
unfulfilling) second life and makes an attempt to regain his identity
by reconverting to Sikhism. He meets his mother (Bibiji) in her final
days and describes his fascinating visits to Buckingham Palace and
being allowed to hold the Koh-i-Noor in his hands. Duleep loses her,
as she dies soon after, and he undertakes a voyage to immerse her
ashes in India. It is a voyage that ends dramatically in Duleep’s
discovery of a second love — a half-Abyssinian girl with a
“saintly” demeanour, an act very much the subject of ridicule for
his English guardians.
There is an excerpt from Edward Said’s
Reflections on Exile in the beginning, which poignantly ends with how
“the achievements of exile are permanently undermined by the loss of
something left behind forever”. But The Exile doesn’t see Duleep
Singh “achieving” or doing very much, he is pretty much tossed
about by circumstances. It can also be seen as a parable for the
misery and dilemma of the numerous princely families the British dealt
with. The royals, desperate to maintain their status and wealth, were
eventually stripped of it all and pensioned off by the British. It
left behind a royalty with crumbling memories and nostalgia for a
riyaasat that they had lost but they thought they could vaguely stake
claim to. The exile within is what the book deals most with,
imaginatively.
|